Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756843AbaFSCNo (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:13:44 -0400 Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.158]:59452 "EHLO e37.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751283AbaFSCNn (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:13:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:13:37 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Andi Kleen Cc: Dave Hansen , LKML , Josh Triplett , "Chen, Tim C" , Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [bisected] pre-3.16 regression on open() scalability Message-ID: <20140619021337.GA4669@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <539B594C.8070004@intel.com> <20140613224519.GV4581@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <53A0CAE5.9000702@intel.com> <20140618001836.GV4669@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <53A132D4.60408@intel.com> <20140618125831.GB4669@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <53A1CE19.7040103@intel.com> <20140618203052.GT4669@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140618235131.GA25946@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140619014200.GO8178@tassilo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140619014200.GO8178@tassilo.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14061902-7164-0000-0000-0000028979C2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:42:00PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > I still think it's totally the wrong direction to pollute so > many fast paths with this obscure debugging check workaround > unconditionally. OOM prevention should count for something, I would hope. > cond_resched() is in EVERY sleeping lock and in EVERY memory allocation! > And these are really critical paths for many workloads. > > If you really wanted to do this I think you would first need > to define a cond_resched_i_am_not_fast() or somesuch. > > Or put it all behind some debugging ifdef. My first thought was to put it behind CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL, but everyone seems to be enabling that one. As mentioned earlier, I could potentially push the check behind the need-resched check, which would get it off of the common case of the code paths you call out above. Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/