Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757955AbaFSJrT (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2014 05:47:19 -0400 Received: from e23smtp02.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.144]:49169 "EHLO e23smtp02.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932411AbaFSJrQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2014 05:47:16 -0400 Message-ID: <53A2B136.108@in.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:15:26 +0530 From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Masami Hiramatsu CC: Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Tony Luck , Paul Mackerras , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, sparse@chrisli.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com, Ingo Molnar , Fenghua Yu , Arnd Bergmann , Rusty Russell , Chris Wright , yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com, akataria@vmware.com, Tony Luck , Kevin Hao , Linus Torvalds , rdunlap@infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , dl9pf@gmx.de, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64 References: <5387F150.5000307@hitachi.com> <20140530031838.17427.75896.stgit@ltc230.yrl.intra.hitachi.co.jp> <539161D6.7020508@hitachi.com> <1403078179.32307.7.camel@concordia> <53A15201.7060404@hitachi.com> <1403141433.4768.1.camel@concordia> <53A26C99.6060000@hitachi.com> <53A285D0.1030106@in.ibm.com> <53A2908E.2000806@hitachi.com> In-Reply-To: <53A2908E.2000806@hitachi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14061909-5490-0000-0000-000000459CA5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/19/2014 12:56 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2014/06/19 15:40), Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: >> On 06/19/2014 10:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >>> (2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >>>>> (2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerman wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >>>>>>> Ping? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I guess this should go to 3.16 branch, shouldn't it? >>>>>> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h >>>>>>>> index bfb6ded..8b89d65 100644 >>>>>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h >>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h >>>>>>>> @@ -25,6 +25,17 @@ typedef struct { >>>>>>>> unsigned long env; >>>>>>>> } func_descr_t; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC64) && (!defined(_CALL_ELF) || _CALL_ELF == 1) >>>>>>>> +/* >>>>>>>> + * On PPC64 ABIv1 the function pointer actually points to the >>>>>>>> + * function's descriptor. The first entry in the descriptor is the >>>>>>>> + * address of the function text. >>>>>>>> + */ >>>>>>>> +#define function_entry(fn) (((func_descr_t *)(fn))->entry) >>>>>>>> +#else >>>>>>>> +#define function_entry(fn) ((unsigned long)(fn)) >>>>>>>> +#endif >>>>>> >>>>>> We already have ppc_function_entry(), can't you use that? >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to ask you whether the address which ppc_function_entry() returns on >>>>> PPC ABIv2 is really same address in kallsyms or not. >>>>> As you can see, kprobes uses function_entry() to get the actual entry address >>>>> where kallsyms knows. I have not much information about that, but it seems that >>>>> the "global entry point" is the address which kallsyms knows, isn't it? >>>> >>>> OK. I'm not sure off the top of my head which address kallsyms knows about, but >>>> yes it's likely that it is the global entry point. >>>> >>>> I recently sent a patch to add ppc_global_function_entry(), because we need it >>>> in the ftrace code. Once that is merged you could use that. >>> >>> Yeah, I could use that. But since this is used in arch-independent code (e.g. IA64 >>> needs similar macro), I think we'd better define function_entry() in asm/types.h for >>> general use (for kallsyms), and rename ppc_function_entry to local_function_entry() >>> in asm/code-patching.h. >>> >>> >>>> How do you hit the original problem, you don't actually specify in your commit >>>> message? Something with kprobes obviously, but what exactly? I'll try and >>>> reproduce it here. >>> >>> Ah, those messages should be shown in dmesg when booting if it doesn't work, >>> because the messages are printed by initialization process of kprobe blacklist. >>> So, reproducing it is just enabling CONFIG_KPROBES and boot it. >> Well, we don't get those messages on Power, since the kallsyms has the >> entries for ".function_name". The correct way to verify is, either : > > Hmm, that seems another issue on powerpc. Is that expected(and designed) > behavior? AFAIK, yes, it is. To be more precise : we have 'foo' and '.foo' for a function foo(), where 'foo' points to the function_entry and '.foo' points to the actual function. So, a kallsyms_lookup_size_offset() on both 'foo' and '.foo' will return a hit. So, if we make sure we use the value of '.foo' (by using the appropriate macros) we should be fine. And if so, how I can verify when initializing blacklist? > (should I better use kallsyms_lookup() and kallsyms_lookup_name() for > verification?) One way to verify would be to make sure the symbol starts with '.' from the result of the current kallsyms_lookup_size_offset() for PPC. Thanks Suzuki > > Thank you, > >> >> 1) Dump the black_list via xmon ( see : >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/29/893 ) and verify the entries. >> >> or >> >> 2) Issue a kprobe on a black listed entry and hit a success,(which we >> will, since we don't check the actual function address). >> >> Thanks >> Suzuki >> >> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/