Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757992AbaFSLh7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:37:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:28504 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757129AbaFSLh6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:37:58 -0400 Message-ID: <53A2CB92.3040601@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:37:54 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bandan Das CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gleb@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/25] KVM: emulate: extend memory access optimization to stores References: <1402318753-23362-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1402318753-23362-13-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Il 09/06/2014 20:40, Bandan Das ha scritto: > Paolo Bonzini writes: > >> > Even on a store the optimization saves about 50 clock cycles, >> > mostly because the jump in write_memory_operand becomes much more >> > predictable. >> > >> > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini >> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > Isn't the reviewed-by automatically implied ? :) > This patch breaks x86/vmx.flat, but apart from this the series passes Autotest and kvm-unit-tests. I'm going to leave the memory access optimization out, and push the rest to kvm/queue. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/