Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 02:19:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 02:19:50 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:50387 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 02:19:48 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: Doug Ledford Cc: Alexander Viro , Linux Scsi Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Why /dev/sdc1 doesn't show up... In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:09:24 CDT." <20021119000924.GD6989@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 07:58:13 +1100 Message-Id: <20021120072653.E1EC72C060@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1201 Lines: 30 In message <20021119000924.GD6989@redhat.com> you write: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:49:21AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > > In message you > > write: > > > Not really. For case in question (block devices) there is only one path > > > and I'd rather keep it that way, thank you very much. > > > > See other posting. This is a fundamental design decision, and it's > > not changing. Sorry. > > Then you'll have to back out the patch to module.c because it's already > changed. Yeah, I just noticed. To be honest, I was wrong. And the code shouldn't be put back until (if ever) I have a solution which solves the races and *doesn't* break working code. And meanwhile, there are more important things (like reducing the 400k overhead of CONFIG_KALLSYMS adds to the kernel). Sorry for the overzealousness, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/