Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756016AbaFTQHR (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:07:17 -0400 Received: from qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.80]:37532 "EHLO qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933940AbaFTQHP (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:07:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:07:13 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: "Paul E. McKenney" cc: josh@joshtriplett.org, Andi Kleen , Dave Hansen , LKML , "Chen, Tim C" Subject: Re: [bisected] pre-3.16 regression on open() scalability In-Reply-To: <20140620153839.GB4904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20140619014200.GO8178@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20140619180916.GE4904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140619204220.GJ4904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140619213203.GA16747@cloud> <20140619230732.GX4904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140620153839.GB4904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > And the fraction of the small systems that care that much about latency > is also quite small. This also impacts general performance of course not only latency. > Of course, if you have performance results that show otherwise, please > share them. We are discussing a performance problem right here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/