Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:18:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:18:28 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:1409 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:18:26 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH-2.5.47-ac6] Updates to BIOS IDE timings code From: Alan Cox To: Torben Mathiasen Cc: alan@xorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20021120104313.GA1855@tmathiasen> References: <20021120104313.GA1855@tmathiasen> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 20 Nov 2002 13:53:50 +0000 Message-Id: <1037800430.3267.8.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 828 Lines: 19 On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 10:43, Torben Mathiasen wrote: > What hasn't been addresses yet, but that I'm working on is proper simplex > detection when 'biostimings' are used. However, to me it seems like the simplex > code is in the middle of being updated, right? On some chipsets we make just > dma_base isn't set on both interfaces if device claims to be simplex. On others > we force dma on both channels if simplex mode, why? See the documentation for the chips concerned, that ought to make it more obvious. I dont think any of the examples I have docs for are non-NDA'd 8( Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/