Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:43:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:43:56 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:16257 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:43:56 -0500 Subject: Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules From: Alan Cox To: Xavier Bestel Cc: Mark Mielke , Rik van Riel , David McIlwraith , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1037787457.19242.6.camel@localhost> References: <024101c2903f$7650a050$41368490@archaic> <20021120081215.GC26018@mark.mielke.cc> <1037787457.19242.6.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 20 Nov 2002 14:19:15 +0000 Message-Id: <1037801955.3241.21.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 847 Lines: 21 On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 10:17, Xavier Bestel wrote: > Yeah, that's precisely the problem here: the binary-only module is > distributed with included spinlock code, which *is* GPL. That doesnt neccessarily make it a derived work. Suppose I publish a book including a lawyer who says "Your honour I ...". That doesn't make it a derivative of some previous work I read that used the same phrase. Equally if I paraphase the entire court scene but use no identical words it may be a derived work. Stop thinking about this as a mathematical question. It isnt about the union of sets of instructions. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/