Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262425AbSKTTFY>; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:05:24 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262442AbSKTTFR>; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:05:17 -0500
Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:53509
	"EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S262425AbSKTTFA>; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:05:00 -0500
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:11:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc: Ross Vandegrift <ross@willow.seitz.com>,
       Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules
In-Reply-To: <1037820823.3267.60.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10211201109320.3892-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 779
Lines: 28

On 20 Nov 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 18:57, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > The double negative unwrapped:
> > 
> > "Being a module doesnt make it not a derivative work."
> > 
> > 'Being a module does (not) make it not a derivative work.'
> > 'Being a module does (not) make it (not) a derivative work.'
> > 
> > 'Being a module does make it a derivative work.'
> > 
> > Is this the intent of the statement?
> 
> No

Excellent!

Now if Linus would just make to position clear.

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/