Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:24:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:24:01 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:63624 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:24:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 19:29:15 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Steffen Persvold Cc: Margit Schubert-While , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.20-rc2 strange L1 cache values Message-ID: <20021120192915.GA14194@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Steffen Persvold , Margit Schubert-While , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20021120190112.GC10698@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1145 Lines: 30 On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:23:04PM +0100, Steffen Persvold wrote: > The original poster reported on 2.4.20-rc2 (which reports 0K), not 2.4.18. > The output I provided was from .18 and that clearly says 'L1 I cache:12K'. > Here are some 'sniplets' of my 2.4.18 dmesg : > CPU: L1 I cache: 12K, L1 D cache: 8K My bad. Yes, earlier kernels did confuse the two. the 12K actually means the trace cache holds 12,000 uops rather than you have 12KB of cache. The only bug is the reporting unit. > Ok, since this is now fixed (with your patch), I really don't care about > earlier kernels anyway (however some of my customer might have if it was > an issue). Do you know if your patch is going into 2.4.20 release (it's a > rather small and useful patch) ? I've resubmitted it to Marcelo, but it still didn't show up.. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/