Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:18:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:18:26 -0500 Received: from green.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.57]:57325 "EHLO green.csi.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:18:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:18:12 +0000 (GMT) From: James Sutherland To: Ray Strode cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff covey Subject: Re: freshmeat editorial on journaling filesystems In-Reply-To: <001901c090bb$ff965420$0200a8c0@halfcomp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Ray Strode wrote: > >We'd like to run an editorial this coming Saturday about the > >journaling filesystems available for Linux. We'd like an author who > >isn't a developer on any of them so he/she can give an object analysis > >of the pros and cons of each and share thoughts on his/her opinions > >about which should be eventually be supported by the kernel. > I disagree. I think you should ask someone who works on more than > one of the filesystems. That person will know the pros and cons of all > of them, and surely will be objective. Either that, or have a developer from each talking about their own FS, and how they think it compares to others. Then an impartial summary of what each has said. James. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/