Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:08:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:08:56 -0500 Received: from ns.splentec.com ([209.47.35.194]:4614 "EHLO pepsi.splentec.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:08:34 -0500 Message-ID: <3DDBFB75.6A3221A8@splentec.com> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:15:33 -0500 From: Luben Tuikov Organization: Splentec Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , axboe@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH]: jiffies wrap in ll_rw_blk.c References: <3DDBF413.C06DAF2E@splentec.com> <1037827173.3267.78.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <3DDBF7FC.B0DBC75D@splentec.com> <1037827888.3267.84.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1447 Lines: 41 Alan Cox wrote: > > On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 21:00, Luben Tuikov wrote:sk) { > > > > - unsigned long duration = jiffies - req->start_time; > > > > + unsigned long duration = (signed) jiffies - (signed) req->start_time; > > > > switch (rq_data_dir(req)) { > > > > > > It was right before. Your patch breaks it. Think about it in unsigned > > > maths > > > > > > 0x00000002 - 0xFFFFFFFF = 0x00000003 > > > > 0x2 - (-0x1) = 0x2 + 0x1 = 0x3 > > > > Right! I thought (signed) does the job. I actually tried > > it both ways and works all right. I guess either way works fine. > > (signed long) maybe - but not signed - long is 64bit on Alpha, (signed) > is 32 Aaaah, I see where you're coming from. I basically tried to stay away from knowing _what_ actual type it is and just to make it signed and do the arithmetic, but didn't know the specific for the Alpha. Shouldn't this be (symbolically:) (signed (typeof(jiffes)) jiffies - (signed (typeof(start)) start -- you know what I mean. But yes both ways should work: a, b are both unsigned, then a-b = a+(-b) and there's just no other way to compute the result. Anyway, doesn't matter, -- Luben - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/