Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753871AbaFXAjn (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:39:43 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:33995 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753193AbaFXAjm (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:39:42 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:39:34 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Dave Hansen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, cl@gentwo.org, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu] Reduce overhead of cond_resched() checks for RCU Message-ID: <20140624003934.GR4603@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20140621025958.GA7185@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <53A85BF9.7030006@intel.com> <53A8611F.1000804@intel.com> <20140623180945.GL4603@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <53A8B884.6000600@intel.com> <20140624001519.GO4603@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <53A8C44E.7050000@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53A8C44E.7050000@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14062400-3532-0000-0000-000002ACA683 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 05:20:30PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 06/23/2014 05:15 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, how many CPUs does your system have? 80? > > If 160, looks like something bad is happening at 80. > > 80 cores, 160 threads. >80 processes/threads is where we start using > the second thread on the cores. The tasks are also pinned to > hyperthread pairs, so they disturb each other, and the scheduler moves > them between threads on occasion which causes extra noise. OK, that could explain the near flattening of throughput near 80 processes. Is 3.16.0-rc1-pf2 with the two RCU patches? If so, is the new sysfs parameter at its default value? Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/