Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:46:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:46:45 -0500 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:5134 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:46:44 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:53:36 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Dave Jones Cc: gallir@uib.es, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br Subject: Re: PATCH: Recognize Tualatin cache size in 2.4.x Message-Id: <20021120225336.4e5beac6.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20021120214104.GA21030@suse.de> References: <200211171549.gAHFnSrE021923@mnm.uib.es> <20021118190200.GA20936@suse.de> <200211182154.52081.gallir@uib.es> <20021119120834.GA32004@suse.de> <20021120210357.70464ff2.skraw@ithnet.com> <20021120214104.GA21030@suse.de> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1927 Lines: 52 On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 21:41:04 +0000 Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:03:57PM +0100, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:08:34 +0000 > > Dave Jones wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:54:52PM +0100, Ricardo Galli wrote: > > > > > > > It's very cosmetic but very annoying for P3 > 1GHz, where Linux <= 2.4.20-preX > > > > only reports 32 KB of cache and it also seems to ignore the "cachesize" > > > > parameter. Perhaps it really uses 256KB, but not sure. > > > > > > There was a bug related to that parameter, I'm sure if the fix > > > went into the same patch, or a separate one. I'll check later. > > > > Sorry for this possibly dumb comment/question: > > my Tualatins have 512KB cache on die. Are we all sure that it's used? > > /proc says indeed 32KB on 2.4.20-rc2 > > Odd. If you can send me the output of dmesg, /proc/cpuinfo > and x86info -a, I'll take a look. > (You can find x86info at > http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/x86info/x86info-1.11.tar.gz) Hi Dave, I just tested your descriptors.diff, and here are the results: (make dep clean bzImage modules modules_install, all same tree of course) 2.4.20-rc2: real 5m27.670s user 5m6.450s sys 0m18.710s real 5m27.590s user 5m6.760s sys 0m18.660s real 5m27.953s user 5m6.900s sys 0m18.310s 2.4.20-rc2 with descriptors.diff: real 5m29.005s user 5m8.540s sys 0m18.610s real 5m27.752s user 5m8.760s sys 0m17.870s real 5m29.021s user 5m8.210s sys 0m18.540s Doesn't really look more than cosmetic, does it? /proc output is correct with your diff. Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/