Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752897AbaFXL1f (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2014 07:27:35 -0400 Received: from mailout2.samsung.com ([203.254.224.25]:10484 "EHLO mailout2.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752825AbaFXL1c (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2014 07:27:32 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfee690-b7fb56d000003439-16-53a960a19a0c From: Pankaj Dubey To: "'Tomasz Figa'" , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, chow.kim@samsung.com, vikas.sajjan@samsung.com References: <1399704998-13321-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <1399704998-13321-11-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <53A07719.7050206@samsung.com> In-reply-to: <53A07719.7050206@samsung.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 10/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Add platform driver support for Exynos PMU. Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:58:47 +0530 Message-id: <007a01cf8f9f$7909c850$6b1d58f0$@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-index: AQFbr3MzJH2VQYc81U++V3sC+P5mXwHxSbcIAc57yfWcSdtvkA== Content-language: en-us X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrIIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWyRsSkVndhwspgg/a1hhbLJt1ls+hdcJXN YtPja6wWl3fNYbOYcX4fk8Xty7wW62e8ZrG4+Ww7kwOHR0tzD5vH5iX1Hn1bVjF6fN4kF8AS xWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJXx/8cKloJVJRXnmkobGB9FdzFyckgImEg8+NvLDmGLSVy4t56ti5GL Q0hgKaPEo3db2WCK5l/dxwSRWMQo8XHiX1aQhJDAX0aJhgl+IDabgK7Ek/dzmUGKRAT6GSVe bv0BVsQskCzx6dwPZojulYwSV3f8A0twCmhL3F26BGy3sECExOZPp1hAbBYBVYmz72aC2bwC lhLb2w8wQtiCEj8m32OBGKolsX7ncSYIW15i85q3zBCnKkjsOPsarF5EwEnizqeJjBA14hKT HjxkBzlCQuAlu8Tf+V+YIJYJSHybfAhoKAdQQlZi0wGoOZISB1fcYJnAKDELyepZSFbPQrJ6 FpIVCxhZVjGKphYkFxQnpReZ6BUn5haX5qXrJefnbmIERu/pf88m7GC8d8D6EGMy0PqJzFKi yfnA6M8riTc0NjOyMDUxNTYytzQjTVhJnFftUVKQkEB6YklqdmpqQWpRfFFpTmrxIUYmDk6p Bka25T1fjy9gOxX5+ld7nGB7WO+t3FdcDu5aXsVMH2Lf2C3o4XZ50L2Hs/XDpERO24Yv0V2P H7+5PJ170eo4fdXC/XVSZy7PCbTeKpo2RyzkbpdO2QIpmVyHn3sz4zf3SR1+Fbnp5ym+NrsU NvviN2VSMYFfvY5yHQtYp61jH7BrvvKEqU/4JiixFGckGmoxFxUnAgCiH1o39AIAAA== X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprAKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t9jAd2FCSuDDU6cU7dYNukum0Xvgqts FpseX2O1uLxrDpvFjPP7mCxuX+a1WD/jNYvFzWfbmRw4PFqae9g8Ni+p9+jbsorR4/MmuQCW qAZGm4zUxJTUIoXUvOT8lMy8dFsl7+B453hTMwNDXUNLC3MlhbzE3FRbJRefAF23zBygK5QU yhJzSoFCAYnFxUr6dpgmhIa46VrANEbo+oYEwfUYGaCBhDWMGf9/rGApWFVSca6ptIHxUXQX IyeHhICJxPyr+5ggbDGJC/fWs3UxcnEICSxilPg48S8rSEJI4C+jRMMEPxCbTUBX4sn7ucwg RSIC/YwSL7f+ACtiFkiW+HTuBzNE90pGias7/oElOAW0Je4uXcIOYgsLREhs/nSKBcRmEVCV OPtuJpjNK2Apsb39ACOELSjxY/I9FoihWhLrdx5ngrDlJTavecsMcaqCxI6zr8HqRQScJO58 msgIUSMuMenBQ/YJjEKzkIyahWTULCSjZiFpWcDIsopRNLUguaA4KT3XSK84Mbe4NC9dLzk/ dxMjODU8k97BuKrB4hCjAAejEg9vROCKYCHWxLLiytxDjBIczEoivF/iVgYL8aYkVlalFuXH F5XmpBYfYjQF+nQis5Rocj4wbeWVxBsam5ibGptamliYmFkqifMebLUOFBJITyxJzU5NLUgt gulj4uCUamB0+PFr05XObc9vxjQ4Pg3vu/AnwC1x8cvZ11g45Co/Lyi3vaqvYrjwwAPmaQld WbnbGqdffn1i4+f/Vz9Jzjsqajj9UVjGi+liYi6iXGHTJRgzLPczNTxwutN/Wntz/rPJZ67u Cw2uia+O2pHO/6jz/KIQmcZLU/RZvJk68m6taXq9cDb7tteOSizFGYmGWsxFxYkAYfEm2yMD AAA= DLP-Filter: Pass X-MTR: 20000000000000000@CPGS X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Tomasz, On Tuesday, June 17 2014, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Pankaj, > > [dropping Young-Gun Jang , as my mailer denies to > send to this address] > Yes, we can drop Young-Gun Jang's email id as it's no more valid. > Please see my comments inline. I have skipped comments for changed related to > regmap, as according to our previous discussion they will be dropped in next version. > > On 10.05.2014 08:56, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > > This patch modifies Exynos Power Management Unit (PMU) initialization > > implementation in following way: > > > > - Added platform_device support by registering static platform device. > > - Added platform struct exynos_pmu_data to hold platform specific data. > > - For each SoC's PMU support now we can add platform data and statically > > bind PMU configuration and SoC specific initialization function. > > - Probe function will scan DT and based on matching PMU compatibility > > string initialize pmu_context which will be platform_data for driver. > > - Obtain PMU regmap handle using "syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle" so > > that we can reduce dependency over machine header files. > > - Separate each SoC's PMU initialization function and make it as part of > > platform data. > > - It also removes uses of soc_is_exynosXYZ() thus making PMU implementation > > independent of "plat/cpu.h". > > > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey > > Signed-off-by: Young-Gun Jang > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c | 266 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 210 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c > > index 67116a5..6a7fa8e 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c > > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > > /* > > - * Copyright (c) 2011-2012 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > > + * Copyright (c) 2011-2014 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > > * http://www.samsung.com/ > > * > > * EXYNOS - CPU PMU(Power Management Unit) support @@ -9,20 +9,33 > @@ > > * published by the Free Software Foundation. > > */ > > > > -#include > > -#include > > +#include > > #include > > - > > -#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > > > #include "common.h" > > #include "regs-pmu.h" > > > > -static const struct exynos_pmu_conf *exynos_pmu_config; -static > > struct regmap *pmu_regmap; > > +struct exynos_pmu_data { > > + const struct exynos_pmu_conf *pmu_config; > > + const struct exynos_pmu_conf *pmu_config_extra; > > + void (*pmu_init)(void); > > + void (*powerdown_conf)(enum sys_powerdown); }; > > + > > +struct exynos_pmu_context { > > + struct device *dev; > > + struct exynos_pmu_data *pmu_data; > > + struct regmap *pmu_regmap; > > +}; > > + > > +static struct exynos_pmu_context *pmu_context; > > > > static const struct exynos_pmu_conf exynos4210_pmu_config[] = { > > - /* { .reg = address, .val = { AFTR, LPA, SLEEP } */ > > + /* { .offset = address, .val = { AFTR, LPA, SLEEP } */ > > AFAICT those have changed already in patch 08/11. > Will correct this. > > { S5P_ARM_CORE0_LOWPWR, { 0x0, 0x0, 0x2 } }, > > { S5P_DIS_IRQ_CORE0, { 0x0, 0x0, 0x0 } }, > > { S5P_DIS_IRQ_CENTRAL0, { 0x0, 0x0, 0x0 } }, > > @@ -216,7 +229,7 @@ static const struct exynos_pmu_conf > > exynos4412_pmu_config[] = { }; > > > > static const struct exynos_pmu_conf exynos5250_pmu_config[] = { > > - /* { .reg = address, .val = { AFTR, LPA, SLEEP } */ > > + /* { .offset = address, .val = { AFTR, LPA, SLEEP } */ > > Ditto. > > > { EXYNOS5_ARM_CORE0_SYS_PWR_REG, { 0x0, 0x0, 0x2} > }, > > { EXYNOS5_DIS_IRQ_ARM_CORE0_LOCAL_SYS_PWR_REG, { > 0x0, 0x0, 0x0} }, > > { EXYNOS5_DIS_IRQ_ARM_CORE0_CENTRAL_SYS_PWR_REG, { > 0x0, 0x0, 0x0} }, > > @@ -339,7 +352,7 @@ static unsigned int const exynos5_list_diable_wfi_wfe[] = > { > > EXYNOS5_ISP_ARM_OPTION, > > }; > > > > -static void exynos5_init_pmu(void) > > +void exynos5_powerdown_conf(enum sys_powerdown mode) > > static > OK. > > { > > unsigned int i; > > unsigned int tmp; > > @@ -348,81 +361,222 @@ static void exynos5_init_pmu(void) > > * Enable both SC_FEEDBACK and SC_COUNTER > > */ > > for (i = 0 ; i < ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_list_both_cnt_feed) ; i++) { > > - regmap_read(pmu_regmap, exynos5_list_both_cnt_feed[i], &tmp); > > + regmap_read(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, > > + exynos5_list_both_cnt_feed[i], &tmp); > > tmp |= (EXYNOS5_USE_SC_FEEDBACK | > > EXYNOS5_USE_SC_COUNTER); > > - regmap_write(pmu_regmap, exynos5_list_both_cnt_feed[i], tmp); > > + regmap_write(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, > > + exynos5_list_both_cnt_feed[i], tmp); > > } > > > > /* > > * SKIP_DEACTIVATE_ACEACP_IN_PWDN_BITFIELD Enable > > */ > > - regmap_read(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_ARM_COMMON_OPTION, > &tmp); > > + regmap_read(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, > EXYNOS5_ARM_COMMON_OPTION, > > +&tmp); > > tmp |= EXYNOS5_SKIP_DEACTIVATE_ACEACP_IN_PWDN; > > - regmap_write(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_ARM_COMMON_OPTION, tmp); > > + regmap_write(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, > EXYNOS5_ARM_COMMON_OPTION, > > +tmp); > > > > /* > > * Disable WFI/WFE on XXX_OPTION > > */ > > for (i = 0 ; i < ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_list_diable_wfi_wfe) ; i++) { > > - tmp = regmap_read(pmu_regmap, exynos5_list_diable_wfi_wfe[i], > > - &tmp); > > + tmp = regmap_read(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, > > + exynos5_list_diable_wfi_wfe[i], &tmp); > > tmp &= ~(EXYNOS5_OPTION_USE_STANDBYWFE | > > EXYNOS5_OPTION_USE_STANDBYWFI); > > - regmap_write(pmu_regmap, exynos5_list_diable_wfi_wfe[i], tmp); > > + regmap_write(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, > > + exynos5_list_diable_wfi_wfe[i], tmp); > > } > > } > > > > void exynos_sys_powerdown_conf(enum sys_powerdown mode) { > > unsigned int i; > > + struct exynos_pmu_data *pmu_data = pmu_context->pmu_data; > > + > > + if (pmu_data->powerdown_conf) > > + pmu_data->powerdown_conf(mode); > > + > > + if (pmu_data->pmu_config) { > > + for (i = 0; (pmu_data->pmu_config[i].offset != PMU_TABLE_END) > ; i++) > > + regmap_write(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, > > + pmu_data->pmu_config[i].offset, > > + pmu_data->pmu_config[i].val[mode]); > > + } > > + > > + if (pmu_data->pmu_config_extra) { > > + for (i = 0; pmu_data->pmu_config_extra[i].offset != > PMU_TABLE_END; i++) > > + regmap_write(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, > > + pmu_data->pmu_config_extra[i].offset, > > + pmu_data->pmu_config_extra[i].val[mode]); > > + } > > +} > > + > > +static void exynos5250_pmu_init(void) { > > + unsigned int tmp; > > + struct regmap *pmu_regmap = pmu_context->pmu_regmap; > > + /* > > + * When SYS_WDTRESET is set, watchdog timer reset request > > + * is ignored by power management unit. > > + */ > > + regmap_read(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_AUTO_WDTRESET_DISABLE, > &tmp); > > + tmp &= ~EXYNOS5_SYS_WDTRESET; > > + regmap_write(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_AUTO_WDTRESET_DISABLE, > tmp); > > + > > + regmap_read(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_MASK_WDTRESET_REQUEST, > &tmp); > > + tmp &= ~EXYNOS5_SYS_WDTRESET; > > + regmap_write(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_MASK_WDTRESET_REQUEST, > tmp); } > > + > > +static struct exynos_pmu_data exynos4210_pmu_data = { > > + .pmu_config = exynos4210_pmu_config, > > +}; > > + > > +static struct exynos_pmu_data exynos4x12_pmu_data = { > > Should be probably called exynos4212_pmu_data. > OK, will update this. > > + .pmu_config = exynos4x12_pmu_config, > > +}; > > + > > +static struct exynos_pmu_data exynos4412_pmu_data = { > > + .pmu_config = exynos4x12_pmu_config, > > + .pmu_config_extra = exynos4412_pmu_config, > > +}; > > + > > +static struct exynos_pmu_data exynos5250_pmu_data = { > > + .pmu_config = exynos5250_pmu_config, > > + .pmu_init = exynos5250_pmu_init, > > + .powerdown_conf = exynos5_powerdown_conf, > > +}; > > + > > +/* > > + * PMU platform driver and devicetree bindings. > > + */ > > +static struct of_device_id exynos_pmu_of_device_ids[] = { > > + { > > + .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu", > > + .data = (void *)&exynos4210_pmu_data, > > + }, > > + { > > + .compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-pmu", > > + .data = (void *)&exynos4x12_pmu_data, > > + }, > > + { > > + .compatible = "samsung,exynos4412-pmu", > > + .data = (void *)&exynos4412_pmu_data, > > + }, > > + { > > + .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", > > + .data = (void *)&exynos5250_pmu_data, > > + }, > > + {}, > > +}; > > + > > +static int exynos_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { > > + struct device_node *np; > > + const struct of_device_id *match; > > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > > > - if (soc_is_exynos5250()) > > - exynos5_init_pmu(); > > + pmu_context = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, > > + sizeof(struct exynos_pmu_context), > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (pmu_context == NULL) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Cannot allocate memory.\n"); > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + } > > + > > + np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, > > + exynos_pmu_of_device_ids, &match); > > + if (!np) { > > + pr_warn("%s, failed to find PMU node\n", __func__); > > + return -ENODEV; > > + } > > > > - for (i = 0; (exynos_pmu_config[i].offset != PMU_TABLE_END) ; i++) > > - regmap_write(pmu_regmap, exynos_pmu_config[i].offset, > > - exynos_pmu_config[i].val[mode]); > > + pmu_context->pmu_data = (struct exynos_pmu_data *) match->data; > > + pmu_context->pmu_regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, > NULL); > > > > - if (soc_is_exynos4412()) { > > - for (i = 0; exynos4412_pmu_config[i].offset != PMU_TABLE_END; > i++) > > - regmap_write(pmu_regmap, exynos4412_pmu_config[i].offset, > > - exynos4412_pmu_config[i].val[mode]); > > + if (IS_ERR(pmu_context->pmu_regmap)) { > > + pr_err("failed to find exynos_pmu_regmap\n"); > > + return PTR_ERR(pmu_context->pmu_regmap); > > } > > + > > + if (pmu_context->pmu_data->pmu_init) > > + pmu_context->pmu_data->pmu_init(); > > + > > + pmu_context->dev = dev; > > + > > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmu_context); > > + > > + pr_info("Exynos PMU Driver probe done!!!\n"); > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int exynos_pmu_suspend(struct device *dev) { > > + /* ToDo: */ > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int exynos_pmu_resume(struct device *dev) { > > + /* ToDo: */ > > + return 0; > > } > > No need to add those if unused. > OK, will remove this. > > > > -static int __init exynos_pmu_init(void) > > +static const struct dev_pm_ops exynos_pmu_pm = { > > + .suspend = exynos_pmu_suspend, > > + .resume = exynos_pmu_resume, > > +}; > > You can drop this structure too. > OK. > > + > > +static int exynos_pmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { > > + /* nothing to do here */ > > + return 0; > > +} > > This function as well. OK. > > > + > > +static struct platform_device *exynos_pmu_pdev; > > + > > +static struct platform_driver exynos_pmu_driver = { > > + .driver = { > > + .name = "exynos-pmu", > > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > > + .pm = &exynos_pmu_pm, > > + }, > > + .probe = exynos_pmu_probe, > > + .remove = exynos_pmu_remove, > > +}; > > + > > +static int __init exynos_pmu_of_init(void) > > { > > - unsigned int value; > > - > > - exynos_pmu_config = exynos4210_pmu_config; > > - pmu_regmap = get_exynos_pmuregmap(); > > - > > - if (soc_is_exynos4210()) { > > - exynos_pmu_config = exynos4210_pmu_config; > > - pr_info("EXYNOS4210 PMU Initialize\n"); > > - } else if (soc_is_exynos4212() || soc_is_exynos4412()) { > > - exynos_pmu_config = exynos4x12_pmu_config; > > - pr_info("EXYNOS4x12 PMU Initialize\n"); > > - } else if (soc_is_exynos5250()) { > > - /* > > - * When SYS_WDTRESET is set, watchdog timer reset request > > - * is ignored by power management unit. > > - */ > > - regmap_read(pmu_regmap, > EXYNOS5_AUTO_WDTRESET_DISABLE, &value); > > - value &= ~EXYNOS5_SYS_WDTRESET; > > - regmap_write(pmu_regmap, > EXYNOS5_AUTO_WDTRESET_DISABLE, value); > > - > > - regmap_read(pmu_regmap, > EXYNOS5_MASK_WDTRESET_REQUEST, &value); > > - value &= ~EXYNOS5_SYS_WDTRESET; > > - regmap_write(pmu_regmap, > EXYNOS5_MASK_WDTRESET_REQUEST, value); > > - > > - exynos_pmu_config = exynos5250_pmu_config; > > - pr_info("EXYNOS5250 PMU Initialize\n"); > > - } else { > > - pr_info("EXYNOS: PMU not supported\n"); > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret = platform_driver_register(&exynos_pmu_driver); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + goto out; > > + > > + exynos_pmu_pdev = platform_device_register_simple("exynos-pmu", -1, > > + NULL, 0); > > Hmm, I don't see the point of making this a platform driver only to register respective > platform device few lines below. If you take into account the patch for syscon I > posted as a reply to patch 06/11, you will be able to make this a normal platform > driver that binds to DT node directly and then register a syscon in probe function > above. > Well I updated PMU to be a syscon provider using your patch. It worked well. I have following two points to mention here: 1: For making PMU a normal platform driver, other than making PMU a syscon provider we need to change PMU's DT binding. Basically we need to remove "syscon" as second compatibility string. I hope this should not be an issue. 2: I can see for your syscon patch Arnd has some comments, hopefully we can address his concern. > > + > > + if (IS_ERR(exynos_pmu_pdev)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(exynos_pmu_pdev); > > + goto out1; > > } > > > > return 0; > > +out1: > > + platform_driver_unregister(&exynos_pmu_driver); > > +out: > > + return ret; > > } > > -arch_initcall(exynos_pmu_init); > > +arch_initcall(exynos_pmu_of_init); > > Is there a need to change the name? > No, I will keep same name. > > + > > +static void __exit exynos_pmu_exit(void) { > > + platform_device_unregister(exynos_pmu_pdev); > > + platform_driver_unregister(&exynos_pmu_driver); > > +} > > +module_exit(exynos_pmu_exit); > > No need for module_exit() in case of such low level code. It will be always built-in. > OK, will remove this. > > + > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Pankaj Dubey > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("EXYNOS > Power Management > > +Unit Driver"); > > > > This driver will never be a module, so I don't think there is any need for those. > OK. > -- > Best regards, > Tomasz Thanks, Pankaj Dubey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/