Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:20:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:20:16 -0500 Received: from bjl1.asuk.net.64.29.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.29.64.88]:42378 "EHLO bjl1.asuk.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:20:15 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:28:29 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier To: Davide Libenzi Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [rfc] epoll interface change and glibc bits ... Message-ID: <20021120232829.GD11879@bjl1.asuk.net> References: <20021120220426.GB11879@bjl1.asuk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1121 Lines: 25 Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > And the lower size of the structure will help to reduce the amount of > > > memory transfered to userspace. I just saw that adding the extra "obj" > > > member lowered performance of about 15% with crazy tests like Ben's > > > pipetest. This because it creates, on my machine, more than 400000 events > > > per second, and saving memory bandwidth on such conditions is a must. With > > > the "more human" http test performance are about the same. > > > > I'd be quite surprised if 400,000 word/sec of memory bandwidth can > > explain a 15% time difference, especially considering all the other > > things that are done to communicate over a pipe (wakeups etc). > > Jamie, they were 16 bytes * 400000, and the token passed through the pipe > was 12 bytes. However, it's 4 bytes (1 word) * 400000 _difference_ between the two tests, yes? -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/