Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:39:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:39:07 -0500 Received: from npt12056206.cts.com ([216.120.56.206]:63498 "HELO forty.spoke.nols.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:38:56 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:38:54 -0800 From: David Rees To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "reiserfs-list@namesys.com" Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Apparent instability of reiserfs on 2.4.1 Message-ID: <20010207083854.F24270@spoke.nols.com> Mail-Followup-To: David Rees , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "reiserfs-list@namesys.com" In-Reply-To: <3A813A63.EBD1B768@namesys.com> <420500000.981560829@tiny> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <420500000.981560829@tiny>; from mason@suse.com on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 10:47:09AM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 10:47:09AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > > Ok, how about we list the known bugs: > > zeros in log files, apparently only between bytes 2048 and 4096 (not > reproduced yet). Could this bug be related to the reported corruption that people with new VIA chipsets have been also reporting on ext2? It seems similar because of the location of the corruption: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=98147483712620&w=2 Anyway, it can't hurt to ask the bug reported if they're using a newer VIA chipset and see if they will upgrade their BIOS which seems to fix the problem. -Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/