Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757100AbaFYOBV (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:01:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:36497 "EHLO mail-pb0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756888AbaFYOBU (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:01:20 -0400 Message-ID: <53AAD62D.3030105@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:01:17 -0600 From: David Ahern User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Fomichev CC: Jiri Olsa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, paulus@samba.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, artagnon@gmail.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, bp@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] perf timechart io mode References: <1403260191-10079-1-git-send-email-stfomichev@yandex-team.ru> <20140624084113.GC31390@krava.redhat.com> <20140624091022.GE20225@stfomichev-desktop.yandex.net> <20140624165712.GA10114@stfomichev-desktop.yandex.net> <53A9B7A4.9050805@gmail.com> <20140624185134.GB1148@krava.brq.redhat.com> <53A9CB6E.5080104@gmail.com> <20140625112019.GC21788@stfomichev-desktop.yandex.net> In-Reply-To: <20140625112019.GC21788@stfomichev-desktop.yandex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/25/14, 5:20 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: >>> maybe we dont need to fail in this case.. seems like it should >>> not be hard to detect, wanr and recover? ;-) > The easiest way is just to bail out and don't try to be smart, that's > what I do now. > > Another approach would be to just convert all my consistency > checks to warnings and skip invalid events (and hope it somehow works). I > think it makes sense when for some reason we have perf.data which > is not really consistent but we still want to get something out of it. If the event type does not make sense how can you trust any other field -- like event size? > >> seems to me it should not be happening at all. It seems like the head caught >> the tail and was not properly detected. > So you mean it perf record's fault? > In my cases I am running perf-record. At the end of the session it walks the events and in too many cases I see the message: 0x113f80 [0x8]: failed to process type: 68 So, yes I think something is happening during the record such as the writer passing the reader and corrupting the buffers. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/