Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757501AbaFYPf0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:35:26 -0400 Received: from kanga.kvack.org ([205.233.56.17]:44558 "EHLO kanga.kvack.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756886AbaFYPfW (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:35:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:35:20 -0400 From: Benjamin LaHaise To: Tejun Heo Cc: cl@linux-foundation.org, kmo@daterainc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] percpu-refcount, aio: use percpu_ref_cancel_init() in ioctx_alloc() Message-ID: <20140625153520.GT23137@kvack.org> References: <1403053685-28240-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1403053685-28240-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20140625143112.GR23137@kvack.org> <20140625145634.GD26883@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140625145634.GD26883@htj.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Tejun, On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:56:34AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Benjamin. ... > It'd probably easier if I route this through percpu tree with the rest > of changes as there are further changes on the aio side (trivial but > still), so we'd end up having to do pulling dance back and forth. The > changes on aio side are mostly trivial. Can I route them through > percpu tree with your acks? Sure, no problem -- add my acks and proceed. I don't think there should be any conflicts. Cheers, -ben > Thanks. > > -- > tejun -- "Thought is the essence of where you are now." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/