Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:48:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:48:41 -0500 Received: from roc-24-95-203-215.rochester.rr.com ([24.95.203.215]:10252 "EHLO d185fcbd7.rochester.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:48:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 11:48:16 -0500 From: Chris Mason To: David Rees , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "reiserfs-list@namesys.com" Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Apparent instability of reiserfs on 2.4.1 Message-ID: <479040000.981564496@tiny> In-Reply-To: <20010207083854.F24270@spoke.nols.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.6b4 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, February 07, 2001 08:38:54 AM -0800 David Rees wrote: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 10:47:09AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: >> >> Ok, how about we list the known bugs: >> >> zeros in log files, apparently only between bytes 2048 and 4096 (not >> reproduced yet). > > Could this bug be related to the reported corruption that people with > new VIA chipsets have been also reporting on ext2? It seems similar > because of the location of the corruption: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=98147483712620&w=2 > > Anyway, it can't hurt to ask the bug reported if they're using a > newer VIA chipset and see if they will upgrade their BIOS which seems > to fix the problem. I'd love to blame this on VIA problems, but people are seeing it on other chipsets too ;-) People who report this aren't seeing general corruption, just zeros in files of specific sizes. So, it really should be a reiserfs bug. -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/