Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932452AbaFYRMi (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:12:38 -0400 Received: from 99-65-72-227.uvs.sntcca.sbcglobal.net ([99.65.72.227]:45412 "EHLO stargate3.asicdesigners.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757754AbaFYRMg (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:12:36 -0400 Message-ID: <53AB02F4.1090701@chelsio.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:12:20 -0700 From: Casey Leedom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , tiwai@suse.de, chunkeey@googlemail.com, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Philip Oswald , Santosh Rastapur , Jeffrey Cheung , David Chang , Hariprasad Shenai Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cxgb4: make configuration load use request_firmware_direct() References: <1403649583-12707-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1403649583-12707-3-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <20140625015048.GI27687@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20140625015048.GI27687@wotan.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/24/14 18:50, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:54:44PM -0700, Casey Leedom wrote: >> [[ Hopefully this makes it through to the kernel.org lists -- I’m using the >> Mac OS/X Mailer and it’s not clear how to force it not to use HTML format. >> -- Casey ]] >> >> So does request_firmware_direct() only fail if the requested file is not >> present on the file system or does it fail in other cases as well? > Same as before they are the same exact call with the only difference > being udev is not used as an extra helper, so it saves the extra > delay caused by udev. That's all. > >> If it’s the former, then the change to cxgb4 is fine. >> >> But if it’s the latter, then it’s definitely not okay. While the driver >> _can_ continue running without the local on-disk Firmware Configuration >> File, that file can be used to significantly change the behavior and >> capabilities of the adapter and is user-customizable. If a user makes >> changes to the local on-disk Firmware Configuration File and these are >> randomly silently ignored this will lead to highly annoying support issues. > This just avoids udev, the request goes directly to the filesystem. The > failure will happen when the file is not present just as before, the > only difference here is skipping udev, it doesn't suffer from the extra > 60 second timeout. There's another possible failure, when > usermodehelper_read_trylock() fails but that is just as the code was before > so this change doesn't introduce that as a new false check. When that > triggers yout get a nasty WARN_ON() just as before. Huh, okay. I guess I'm confused about the value of request_firmware() and the User Device helper. If request_firmware_direct() just goes to the file system to grab the file and returns with ENOENT if it's not there, then you could replace every usage of request_firmware() in the cxgb4 driver as far as I can see ... Either the files are there and we'll use them or they won't be and we'll have to cope with that. Am I missing something? And again, this definitely isn't going to solve the problem that started this whole line of research: we're still going to time out the load of cxgb4 if there are multiple 10Gb/s BT adapters in a system and we need to load each one with both base firmware and PHY firmware. Casey > One thing to note though is that the kernel firmware loader does not > log any failure to the kernel ring buffer if the firmware is not on the > filesystem, while the udev loader is a bit more chatty: > > [ 2463.666120] platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load failed with error -2 > [ 2463.666129] platform fake-dev.0: Falling back to user helper > > Stuffing a print into the non-udev approach upstream seems a bit excessive > though (unless folks disagree), so if you want the driver to be a bit more > informative I think its best to place this feedback on the driver for now. > > I see the driver does provide this information already though so is any > additional prints really desirable ? > > dev_info(adapter->pdev_dev, "Successfully configured using Firmware "\ > "Configuration File \"%s\", version %#x, computed checksum %#x\n", > config_name, finiver, cfcsum); > > Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/