Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 12:13:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 12:13:45 -0500 Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([207.109.151.240]:10756 "EHLO vger.timpanogas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 12:13:38 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:08:52 -0700 From: "Jeff V. Merkey" To: Gregory Maxwell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] Re: PCI-SCI Drivers v1.1-7 released Message-ID: <20010207110852.A27089@vger.timpanogas.org> In-Reply-To: <20010206182501.A23454@vger.timpanogas.org> <20010206190624.C23960@vger.timpanogas.org> <20010206210731.E1110@xi.linuxpower.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20010206210731.E1110@xi.linuxpower.cx>; from greg@linuxpower.cx on Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:07:31PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:07:31PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > So.. It's likely that calling your performance issues 'gcc bugs' is about > the same as saying that SGI cc is buggy because it can't compile the kernel. > > At least you managed to avoid calling RedHat names. :) I really have no idea why gcc 2.96 is so troublesome, but for a commercial release I was somewhat surprised to see the problems I did. I have heard about some of these problems for quite a while, but got a chance to see them upclose with the 7.1 release. Hopefully, RedHat will eventually get the issues smoothed out. Not supporting #ident for CVS managed code bases would see to me, at first glance, to be a show stopper to shipping a release of anything, since many folks need CVS support. :-) Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/