Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755731AbaFZHiE (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:38:04 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com ([74.125.82.179]:58378 "EHLO mail-we0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755002AbaFZHiB (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:38:01 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140625182349.32686.25931@quantum> References: <1403713591-17179-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <44039675.8s16pHQIVH@wuerfel> <20140625182349.32686.25931@quantum> From: Tomeu Vizoso Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:37:40 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lEzY2uMxTgbMeGPCDNO0XGM2CPU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: define and export __clk_get_debug for providers To: Mike Turquette Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Peter De Schrijver , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25 June 2014 20:23, Mike Turquette wrote: > > Peter, > > Just FYI, I'm trying to reverse the trend of prepending double > underscores for functions that are used by clock providers. That stuff > started out small and sort of grew out of control ;-) I'm looking at rebasing Rabin's patches for per-user clks, and I have had to add a few variants for providers, so they can be called with clk_core instead. Have been prepending underscores for those internal variants, but in some cases I had to also append a _internal suffix because there were already variants without locking. What convention were you thinking of for distinguishing provider-only variants for e.g. clk_set_rate? Regards, Tomeu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/