Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754049AbaF3PtI (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:49:08 -0400 Received: from qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.48]:35045 "EHLO qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751385AbaF3PtH (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:49:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:49:03 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: Joonsoo Kim cc: Vladimir Davydov , akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com, penberg@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v3 8/8] slab: do not keep free objects/slabs on dead memcg caches In-Reply-To: <20140627060534.GC9511@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> Message-ID: References: <20140624073840.GC4836@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <20140625134545.GB22340@esperanza> <20140627060534.GC9511@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 27 Jun 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > Christoph, > Is it tolerable result for large scale system? Or do we need to find > another solution? The overhead is pretty intense but then this is a rare event I guess? It seems that it is much easier on the code and much faster to do the periodic reaping. Why not simply go with that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/