Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:41:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:41:43 -0500 Received: from renata.irb.hr ([161.53.129.148]:51463 "EHLO renata.irb.hr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:41:37 -0500 From: Vedran Rodic Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 19:41:25 +0100 To: Chris Mason Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Apparent instability of reiserfs on 2.4.1 Message-ID: <20010207194125.A15780@renata.irb.hr> In-Reply-To: <3A813A63.EBD1B768@namesys.com> <420500000.981560829@tiny> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <420500000.981560829@tiny>; from mason@suse.com on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 10:47:09AM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 10:47:09AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > > > Ok, how about we list the known bugs: > > zeros in log files, apparently only between bytes 2048 and 4096 (not > reproduced yet). > > preallocated block leak on crash (fix in testing) > > hidden directory entry cleanup (still reproducing, very hard to hit). > > knfsd (patches in testing). > > oops in reiserfs_symlink, create_virtual_node (bug in redhat gcc 2.96, > fixed by downloading the update). > > We've also had a few reports of other corruptions, most of which have been > traced to hardware problems. There are two where I'm not sure of the cause > yet, but the method to trigger the bug was too simple to not be a hardware > problem. So could some of this bugs also be present in 3.5.x version of reiserfs? Will you be fixing them for that version? Vedran Rodic - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/