Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757176AbaF3TaY (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:30:24 -0400 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:48072 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757149AbaF3TaV (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:30:21 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 96.249.243.124 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18V1HplUE9lLCDMMesmexSQg8cgk5Dbuck= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.1 titan 1AAEE59EA34 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:30:09 -0400 From: Jason Cooper To: Sricharan R Cc: nm@ti.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, tony@atomide.com, rnayak@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, joe@perches.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 13/16] irqchip: crossbar: Introduce ti,max-crossbar-sources to identify valid crossbar mapping Message-ID: <20140630193009.GB23978@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1403766634-18543-1-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com> <1403766634-18543-14-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com> <20140627120035.GB23978@titan.lakedaemon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140627120035.GB23978@titan.lakedaemon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 08:00:35AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:40:31PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote: > > From: Nishanth Menon > > > > Currently we attempt to map any crossbar value to an IRQ, however, > > this is not correct from hardware perspective. There is a max crossbar > > event number upto which hardware supports. So describe the same in > > device tree using 'ti,max-crossbar-sources' property and use it to > > validate requests. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon > > Signed-off-by: Sricharan R > > Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/crossbar.txt | 2 ++ > > drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++-- > > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/crossbar.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/crossbar.txt > > index 5f45c78..6923531 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/crossbar.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/crossbar.txt > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Required properties: > > - compatible : Should be "ti,irq-crossbar" > > - reg: Base address and the size of the crossbar registers. > > - ti,max-irqs: Total number of irqs available at the interrupt controller. > > +- ti,max-crossbar-sources: Maximum number of crossbar sources that can be routed. > > - ti,reg-size: Size of a individual register in bytes. Every individual > > register is assumed to be of same size. Valid sizes are 1, 2, 4. > > - ti,irqs-reserved: List of the reserved irq lines that are not muxed using > > @@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ Examples: > > compatible = "ti,irq-crossbar"; > > reg = <0x4a002a48 0x130>; > > ti,max-irqs = <160>; > > + ti,max-crossbar-sources = ; > > As mentioned in my reply to #15, I can change this to 400 when I apply > it, or you can send a new version of #15 using the macro and explaining > it's definition. > > Thinking about it more, it's probably best just to use numbers in the > docs. I just did s/MAX_SOURCES/400/ when I applied this. We shouldn't be polluting the binding docs with implementation details. thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/