Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757878AbaGAJWV (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2014 05:22:21 -0400 Received: from fw-tnat.austin.arm.com ([217.140.110.23]:21128 "EHLO collaborate-mta1.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757737AbaGAJWS (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2014 05:22:18 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:22:01 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Hanjun Guo Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Arnd Bergmann , Bjorn Helgaas , "rric@kernel.org" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Sudeep Holla , Mark Rutland , Charles Garcia-Tobin , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , "graeme.gregory@linaro.org" , Al Stone Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/13] ARM64 / ACPI: Enable ARM64 in Kconfig Message-ID: <20140701092201.GF18313@arm.com> References: <1403840976-7456-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1403840976-7456-14-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20140630104652.GG28951@arm.com> <53B2694F.7070501@linaro.org> <53B26F44.7050404@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53B26F44.7050404@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:20:20AM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: > >>> depends on PCI > >>> select PNP > >>> - default y > >>> + default y if !ARM64 > >> > >> For the benefit of single Image, I think you can default to y here. > > > > It ok to me. if we default to y here, devicetree will not be unflattened > > in default, is it ok to you? you can refer to "[PATCH 12/13] ARM64 / ACPI: if > > we chose to boot from acpi then disable FDT". > > Ah, sorry I didn't describe it clearly. since there is no shipping board > with ACPI tables, so ACPI will disabled in the very early stage and FDT > still have chance to be unflattened, so will not break DT booting in > this patchset. That's what I thought. So leaving it as a default y is fine by me. But I would not merge this patch now until we get some useful functionality for arm64. The x86-related cleanup patches can be merged separately via the corresponding trees (it's up to the ACPI and x86 maintainers). -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/