Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758280AbaGATgY (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2014 15:36:24 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:50292 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751499AbaGATgW (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2014 15:36:22 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Liviu Dudau , linux-pci , Bjorn Helgaas , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linaro-kernel , Tanmay Inamdar , Grant Likely , Sinan Kaya , Jingoo Han , Kukjin Kim , Suravee Suthikulanit , Device Tree ML , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/9] pci: Introduce pci_register_io_range() helper function. Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 21:36:10 +0200 Message-ID: <8556461.i7qCGvGY5a@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.11.0-18-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1404240214-9804-4-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> References: <1404240214-9804-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <1404240214-9804-4-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:P1yZxwHFYukz4RFWyrC97nUdGzBR93AKhCh6JPXHihR oETW61vyddLkvOBgiLSwDMmdTX5X5yuiE0vxrv4CCKmnQY9jmf F6ZCCBiVbBWZ7nyJkLVucZIZ8PbwMxB2wjvWpPX31r8MrUlKEh W494bIdUlszPKPvqWwPmMxGVYhEyeNOCcPLqfuGVYUjXdQJFDu SMweUycvRVHvJyyyO51zR9KFyqIK6N2O7loNJOVCRFkIvuLDn+ ett5xv6W/cONHUdbVgeVbwNWh3ELzuBkSP2RJl1z5KeWpnbWx0 QfDvgB+GiH9qKgeR+D79GpZ2cPDb1tgqEXcWU2p6BTiaSv14aj xOYoOmC5/DvO6ZTjn9og= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 01 July 2014 19:43:28 Liviu Dudau wrote: > +/* > + * Record the PCI IO range (expressed as CPU physical address + size). > + * Return a negative value if an error has occured, zero otherwise > + */ > +int __weak pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t addr, resource_size_t size) > +{ > +#ifdef PCI_IOBASE > + struct io_range *res; > + resource_size_t allocated_size = 0; > + > + /* check if the range hasn't been previously recorded */ > + list_for_each_entry(res, &io_range_list, list) { > + if (addr >= res->start && addr + size <= res->start + size) > + return 0; > + allocated_size += res->size; > + } > + > + /* range not registed yet, check for available space */ > + if (allocated_size + size - 1 > IO_SPACE_LIMIT) > + return -E2BIG; > + > + /* add the range to the list */ > + res = kzalloc(sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!res) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + res->start = addr; > + res->size = size; > + > + list_add_tail(&res->list, &io_range_list); > + > + return 0; > +#else > + return -EINVAL; > +#endif > +} > + > unsigned long __weak pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t address) > { > +#ifdef PCI_IOBASE > + struct io_range *res; > + resource_size_t offset = 0; > + > + list_for_each_entry(res, &io_range_list, list) { > + if (address >= res->start && > + address < res->start + res->size) { > + return res->start - address + offset; > + } > + offset += res->size; > + } > + > + return (unsigned long)-1; > +#else > if (address > IO_SPACE_LIMIT) > return (unsigned long)-1; > > return (unsigned long) address; > +#endif > } This still conflicts with the other allocator you have in patch 9 for pci_remap_iospace: nothing guarantees that the mapping is the same for both. Also, this is a completely pointless exercise at this moment, because nobody cares about the result of pci_address_to_pio on architectures that don't already provide this function. If we ever get a proper Open Firmware implementation that wants to put hardcoded PCI devices into DT, we can add an implementation, but for now this seems overkill. The allocator in pci_register_io_range seems reasonable, why not merge this function with pci_remap_iospace() as I have asked you multiple times before? Just make it return the io_offset so the caller can put that into the PCI host resources. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/