Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:57:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:57:19 -0500 Received: from bjl1.asuk.net.64.29.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.29.64.88]:15249 "EHLO bjl1.asuk.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:57:19 -0500 Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:06:17 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier To: David Schwartz Cc: gianni@ecsc.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: TCP memory pressure question Message-ID: <20021123000616.GB19162@bjl1.asuk.net> References: <1037966789.6079.33.camel@lemsip> <20021122202855.AAA322@shell.webmaster.com@whenever> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021122202855.AAA322@shell.webmaster.com@whenever> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 498 Lines: 13 David Schwartz wrote: > So this would be a case where 'poll' or 'select' would return > a write hit for a socket but 'write' would return -1 and set errno > to EAGAIN. Is this really true? It would livelock several servers I've worked on... -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/