Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751957AbaGBLtE (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2014 07:49:04 -0400 Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9]:42815 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750880AbaGBLtB (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2014 07:49:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:48:53 +0200 From: Boris BREZILLON To: David Miller Cc: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com, linux@maxim.org.za, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: at91: remove phy fixup for sama5d3xek boards Message-ID: <20140702134853.43d624c9@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20140701.153806.1074873302413556163.davem@redhat.com> References: <1403777615-25685-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20140701.153806.1074873302413556163.davem@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello David, On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 15:38:06 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote: > From: Boris BREZILLON > Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:13:33 +0200 > > > This patch removes a board specific hook for sama5d3xek boards from > > the sama5d3 generic DT board file. > > > > This hook (which register a phy fixup configuring board specific > > delays in the ksz9021 ethernet phy) is now replaced by the > > appropriate DT properties definitions in the sama5d3xcm.dtsi file. > > > > Changes since v1: > > - fix txc-skew-ps and rxc-skew-ps delays > > - remove phy address info to handle Ronetix and Embest HW designs > > These patches do not apply cleanly to 'net' nor 'net-next', in fact > you did not even say which tree these changes are targetting. Actually, these patches were intended to be taken through at91 (and then arm-soc) tree. The reason I added netdev in Cc is because I wanted to get feedback on the DT phy node definition (which I got from Florian). I guess patch 2 does not apply cleanly because I based this work on top of other changes which are not merged yet ([1]). Nicolas, I'll take care to rebase this series on top of linus/master branch (or whatever branch you want me to base it onto). Thanks, Boris [1]http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-June/265216.html -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/