Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965045AbaGCJXV (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2014 05:23:21 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:52020 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964923AbaGCJXK (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2014 05:23:10 -0400 From: Luis Henriques To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Cc: Naoya Horiguchi , Kamil Iskra , Andi Kleen , Borislav Petkov , Chen Gong , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Luis Henriques Subject: [PATCH 3.11 095/198] mm/memory-failure.c: support use of a dedicated thread to handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 10:18:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1404379241-8590-96-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1404379241-8590-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> References: <1404379241-8590-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.11.10.13 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Naoya Horiguchi commit 3ba08129e38437561df44c36b7ea9081185d5333 upstream. Currently memory error handler handles action optional errors in the deferred manner by default. And if a recovery aware application wants to handle it immediately, it can do it by setting PF_MCE_EARLY flag. However, such signal can be sent only to the main thread, so it's problematic if the application wants to have a dedicated thread to handler such signals. So this patch adds dedicated thread support to memory error handler. We have PF_MCE_EARLY flags for each thread separately, so with this patch AO signal is sent to the thread with PF_MCE_EARLY flag set, not the main thread. If you want to implement a dedicated thread, you call prctl() to set PF_MCE_EARLY on the thread. Memory error handler collects processes to be killed, so this patch lets it check PF_MCE_EARLY flag on each thread in the collecting routines. No behavioral change for all non-early kill cases. Tony said: : The old behavior was crazy - someone with a multithreaded process might : well expect that if they call prctl(PF_MCE_EARLY) in just one thread, then : that thread would see the SIGBUS with si_code = BUS_MCEERR_A0 - even if : that thread wasn't the main thread for the process. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi Reviewed-by: Tony Luck Cc: Kamil Iskra Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Chen Gong Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- Documentation/vm/hwpoison.txt | 5 ++++ mm/memory-failure.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/vm/hwpoison.txt b/Documentation/vm/hwpoison.txt index 550068466605..6ae89a9edf2a 100644 --- a/Documentation/vm/hwpoison.txt +++ b/Documentation/vm/hwpoison.txt @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ PR_MCE_KILL PR_MCE_KILL_EARLY: Early kill PR_MCE_KILL_LATE: Late kill PR_MCE_KILL_DEFAULT: Use system global default + Note that if you want to have a dedicated thread which handles + the SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO) on behalf of the process, you should + call prctl(PR_MCE_KILL_EARLY) on the designated thread. Otherwise, + the SIGBUS is sent to the main thread. + PR_MCE_KILL_GET return current mode diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c index 4c7dda814f9c..159b4506f042 100644 --- a/mm/memory-failure.c +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c @@ -382,15 +382,44 @@ static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill, int trapno, } } -static int task_early_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, int force_early) +/* + * Find a dedicated thread which is supposed to handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO) + * on behalf of the thread group. Return task_struct of the (first found) + * dedicated thread if found, and return NULL otherwise. + * + * We already hold read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in the caller, so we don't + * have to call rcu_read_lock/unlock() in this function. + */ +static struct task_struct *find_early_kill_thread(struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + struct task_struct *t; + + for_each_thread(tsk, t) + if ((t->flags & PF_MCE_PROCESS) && (t->flags & PF_MCE_EARLY)) + return t; + return NULL; +} + +/* + * Determine whether a given process is "early kill" process which expects + * to be signaled when some page under the process is hwpoisoned. + * Return task_struct of the dedicated thread (main thread unless explicitly + * specified) if the process is "early kill," and otherwise returns NULL. + */ +static struct task_struct *task_early_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, + int force_early) { + struct task_struct *t; if (!tsk->mm) - return 0; + return NULL; if (force_early) - return 1; - if (tsk->flags & PF_MCE_PROCESS) - return !!(tsk->flags & PF_MCE_EARLY); - return sysctl_memory_failure_early_kill; + return tsk; + t = find_early_kill_thread(tsk); + if (t) + return t; + if (sysctl_memory_failure_early_kill) + return tsk; + return NULL; } /* @@ -412,16 +441,17 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill, read_lock(&tasklist_lock); for_each_process (tsk) { struct anon_vma_chain *vmac; + struct task_struct *t = task_early_kill(tsk, force_early); - if (!task_early_kill(tsk, force_early)) + if (!t) continue; anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach(vmac, &av->rb_root, pgoff, pgoff) { vma = vmac->vma; if (!page_mapped_in_vma(page, vma)) continue; - if (vma->vm_mm == tsk->mm) - add_to_kill(tsk, page, vma, to_kill, tkc); + if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm) + add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill, tkc); } } read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); @@ -442,10 +472,10 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill, read_lock(&tasklist_lock); for_each_process(tsk) { pgoff_t pgoff = page->index << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT); + struct task_struct *t = task_early_kill(tsk, force_early); - if (!task_early_kill(tsk, force_early)) + if (!t) continue; - vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, pgoff) { /* @@ -455,8 +485,8 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill, * Assume applications who requested early kill want * to be informed of all such data corruptions. */ - if (vma->vm_mm == tsk->mm) - add_to_kill(tsk, page, vma, to_kill, tkc); + if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm) + add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill, tkc); } } read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/