Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:32:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:32:58 -0500 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:4342 "EHLO av.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:32:56 -0500 Message-ID: <3DE09E60.407FE8D6@mvista.com> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 01:39:44 -0800 From: george anzinger Organization: Monta Vista Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20b i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: arun4linux CC: John K Luebs , linux-kernel Subject: Re: switching to interrupt contex when no interrupts References: <200211231948.BAA22590@WS0005.indiatimes.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3152 Lines: 79 arun4linux wrote: > > Hello, > > < interrupt handler. > >>Yes. But my requirement is to force my code to run in interrupt context. > > < > You will get a better answer from the list if you describe what you are trying to do (in concrete terms), not how you think you might do it. > > >>My requirement is to simulate a PCI based controller and its behaviour in software. I knew the different type of interrupts and the timings my device produces. > > I need to simulate this PCI device, its interrupts in sequence and I have to process them in my driver software. > > Hope this make sense now. > > Anyway, my requrirement is to simulate the interrupts and process them in the interrupt context. > > It would be helpful, if anyone could help me how to do it. > My idea is to use task queues and bottom halves for this. But I'd like to get clarified on simulating interrupts (rasing the process/task context to interrupt context) and its consequences. > Why simulate the interrupts when you can just program them? On the x86 machine the "int x" instruction generates an interrupt to irq "x"+32. You do need to be in kernel land to do this, but then I assume that is not a problem. -g > > Thanks & Warm Regards > Arun > > "John K Luebs" wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 07:37:33AM +0530, arun4linux wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to force my kernel module to run at interrupt context at some specific points/time and then come back from interrrupt contex after executing that particular portion of code.. > > You seem to be over complexifying what interrupt context is. It is > simply a generic term for a context that executes on account of an > architecture interrupt. One is forced to run in interrupt context in an > interrupt handler. > > You "run" in interrupt context by calling request_irq attached to the > interrupt line that you are interested in installing a handler for. > > > > > Is it possible? > > Possibility is undefined here because what you said makes no sense. > > You will get a better answer from the list if you describe what you are > trying to do (in concrete terms), not how you think you might do it. > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com > > Buy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories from http://www.planetm.co.in > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- George Anzinger george@mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/