Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759409AbaGCSew (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:34:52 -0400 Received: from g4t3427.houston.hp.com ([15.201.208.55]:1797 "EHLO g4t3427.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752681AbaGCSev (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:34:51 -0400 Message-ID: <1404412485.8764.33.camel@j-VirtualBox> Subject: Re: [RFC] Cancellable MCS spinlock rework From: Jason Low To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Peter Zijlstra , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org, Waiman.Long@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com, andi@firstfloor.org, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, aswin@hp.com, scott.norton@hp.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 11:34:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1404407389.2498.3.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <1404318070-2856-1-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com> <20140702162749.GP19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1404320356.3170.12.camel@j-VirtualBox> <20140702172333.GQ19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1404322203.3170.17.camel@j-VirtualBox> <20140703073107.GS19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1404407389.2498.3.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 10:09 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 09:31 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 10:30:03AM -0700, Jason Low wrote: > > > Would potentially reducing the size of the rw semaphore structure by 32 > > > bits (for all architectures using optimistic spinning) be a nice > > > benefit? > > > > Possibly, although I had a look at the mutex structure and we didn't > > have a hole to place it in, unlike what you found with the rwsem. > > Yeah, and currently struct rw_semaphore is the largest lock we have in > the kernel. Shaving off space is definitely welcome. Right, especially if it could help things like xfs inode. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/