Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 09:45:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 09:45:02 -0500 Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.139]:25868 "EHLO smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 09:45:01 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 15:51:58 +0100 (CET) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Alexander Viro cc: Werner Almesberger , Patrick Mochel , Rusty Lynch , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [BUG] sysfs on 2.5.48 unable to remove files while in use In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 769 Lines: 20 Hi, On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Alexander Viro wrote: > c) mkdir creating non-empty directory or rmdir removing non-empty directory > is *ugly*. BTW, Roman's "filesystem" for modules in its current form is > vetoed, as far as I'm concerned - this sort of magic is just plain wrong. I'm open to alternative ideas. If the contents of the dir again is controlled by the fs itself, I don't really see a problem. You need some way to tell the kernel "please create this object and give me an interface to control it". bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/