Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753395AbaGEQHH (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2014 12:07:07 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0112.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.112]:59206 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752327AbaGEQHF (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2014 12:07:05 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 50,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:967:968:973:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1537:1567:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2525:2560:2563:2682:2685:2828:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3872:3873:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:3956:3959:4321:5007:6119:7652:7903:8985:9025:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12043:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: cake63_3d67dc5f1e13d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1779 Message-ID: <1404576420.6384.41.camel@joe-AO725> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] declance: Fix 64-bit compilation warnings From: Joe Perches To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Grant Likely , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 09:07:00 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20140702.182807.1245632778216212860.davem@davemloft.net> <1404356734.14741.18.camel@joe-AO725> <1404364565.14741.26.camel@joe-AO725> <1404368746.14741.36.camel@joe-AO725> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 15:56 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > One question though, does either of you or anybody else know why we're > inconsistent about this 0x prefixing of virtual addresses vs physical > addresses? Specifically %p vs e.g. %pad. I think it's a mistake and I agree. I submitted a patch to remove the prefix from %pad. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/21/333 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/