Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752982AbaGFFVM (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jul 2014 01:21:12 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f181.google.com ([209.85.220.181]:57978 "EHLO mail-vc0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751861AbaGFFVK (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jul 2014 01:21:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20140704164251.7dc67e07@canb.auug.org.au> <20140705011058.198ae810@canb.auug.org.au> <20140705004846.GA11659@fieldses.org> Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 01:21:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4 From: Nick Krause To: Sachin Kamat Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , Stephen Rothwell , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sorry my mistake some of this are wrong I will resend. Cheers Nick On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Nick Krause wrote: > Here are my test logs for arm. Most of the failures from these builds > not having default configures or make one by one errors. Below are > my typed results. > Results > iop13xx_defconfig - Successes in my tests > mackerel_defconfig - Fails in my tests > nuc910_defconfig - Fails in my tests > nuc950_defconfig -Fails in my tests > nuc960_defconfig - Fails in my tests > s5p64x0_defconfig - Fails in my tests > s5p64x0_defconfig - Fails in my tests > arm-randconfig -Fails in my tests > BF561-ACVILON_defconfig -Fails in my tests > BlackStamp_defconfig - Fails in my tests > TCM-BF518_defconfig - Fails in my tests > > Cheers Nick > > On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Nick Krause wrote: >> Hey guys , >> I checking Sachin Karmat's tests and fixing compile issues with >> patches if need be. In my next email I am going to give a up to date >> log of still failing builds for arm. >> Cheers Nick >> >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote: >>> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 6:18 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 01:10:58AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>>> Hi Sachin, >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 14:12:11 +0530 Sachin Kamat wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Was bisecting a kernel crash on Arndale octa board (Exynos5420). It >>>>> > points to a merge >>>>> > commit: >>>>> > 40556a4c485d12d324f1ea196cc30f590e564237 is the first bad commit >>>>> > ("Merge remote-tracking branch 'nfsd/nfsd-next'"). >>>>> > >>>>> > How do I proceed with this? >>>>> >>>>> I guess we get the owner of the tree (possibly) in question involved >>>>> (cc'd). >>>> >>>> Looking at the total diffstat for that branch, it's almost all contained >>>> in fs/nfsd with a little in include/linux/sunrpc/ and net/sunrpc. So >>>> it's extremely unlikely that it would be causing a problem unless you're >>>> actually testing nfsd. >>> >>> I found it surprising too as I do not use nfsd. I will try out the things >>> suggested by Stephen and update. >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Sachin. >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/