Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:06:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:06:23 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:58885 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:06:18 -0500 Subject: Re: Promise, DMA and RAID5 problems running 2.4.1 To: VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz (Petr Vandrovec) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 20:06:21 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), sajjad@vgkk.com (A.Sajjad Zaidi), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <14D3DB587F98@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz> from "Petr Vandrovec" at Feb 07, 2001 08:40:21 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Iff CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECS is set then yes, doing schedule is better. > But I do not see any benefit in doing > > unsigned long timeout = jiffies + ((HZ + 19)/20) + 1; > while (0 < (signed long)(timeout - jiffies)); On that bit we agree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/