Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:33:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:33:20 -0500 Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.139]:47626 "EHLO smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:33:20 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 20:40:12 +0100 (CET) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Patrick Mochel cc: Werner Almesberger , Alexander Viro , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [BUG] sysfs on 2.5.48 unable to remove files while in use In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 883 Lines: 21 Hi, On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Patrick Mochel wrote: > [ From a purist standpoint, it's still a little weird. Al has been telling > me for ages that the only proper way to do it is to have each object get a > mountpoint instead of a directory. According to him, which I generally > take as gospel, it's the only way to do in-kernel filesystems in a > race-free way. It's hard, and IIRC, there are several infrastructural > changes that must take place in order for it to happen. (I think I still > have the IRC log somewhere..) But, it might happen someday.. ] What advantages do mountpoints have compared to normal directories? bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/