Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:54:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:54:31 -0500 Received: from keetweej.xs4all.nl ([213.84.46.114]:128 "EHLO muur.intranet.vanheusden.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:54:30 -0500 From: "Folkert van Heusden" To: "=?us-ascii?B?J0Vyc2VrIExhc3psbyc=?=" , Subject: RE: [PATCH] rbtree Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 22:01:37 +0100 Message-ID: <005501c294c5$d8b1e300$3640a8c0@boemboem> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1168 Lines: 40 Not trying to be negative and also really wondering this: won't the compiler produce the same code for: if (!variable) and if (variable == 0) ? -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]Namens Ersek Laszlo Verzonden: zondag 24 november 2002 23:41 Aan: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Onderwerp: [PATCH] rbtree Hi all, this patch tries to remove those checks for 0 from linux-2.4.19/lib/rbtree.c which are (I think) superfluous. Laszlo Ersek --- linux-2.4.19/lib/rbtree.c Sat Aug 3 02:39:46 2002 +++ linux/lib/rbtree.c Sun Nov 24 22:59:38 2002 @@ -159,17 +159,16 @@ if (!other->rb_right || other->rb_right->rb_color == RB_BLACK) { - register rb_node_t * o_left; - if ((o_left = other->rb_left)) - o_left->rb_color = RB_BLACK; + /* unneeded check-for-0 removed */ + other->rb_left->rb_color = RB_BLACK; ... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/