Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:05:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:05:16 -0500 Received: from c3po.aoltw.net ([64.236.137.25]:44191 "EHLO netscape.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:05:09 -0500 Message-ID: <3DE2AE4C.6070904@netscape.com> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:12:12 -0800 From: jgmyers@netscape.com (John Myers) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021121 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Davide Libenzi CC: linux-kernel Subject: Re: [rfc] new poll callback'd wake up hell ... References: <3DE29EB9.9050301@netscape.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 478 Lines: 16 Davide Libenzi wrote: >No, look at the code : > > Ok, I completely misread what you wrote. I thought you were suggestiong a change to the locking behavior of wake_up() itself. One wonders if a work-to-do would be appropriate. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/