Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753856AbaGHJUb (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 05:20:31 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173]:34200 "EHLO mail-qc0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753050AbaGHJU3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 05:20:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140708094149.0ad6ab13@free-electrons.com> References: <20140703135146.GA6898@luxor.wired.org> <53B5C61D.2060308@free-electrons.com> <53B5CA26.7050405@free-electrons.com> <1936558.QaAG1bYMuD@avalon> <20140705150308.GA28791@arch.cereza> <20140705205951.GB3678@kroah.com> <20140707105818.GA1101@arch.cereza> <20140707183002.GA5947@kroah.com> <20140707233758.GA1456@arch.cereza> <20140708094149.0ad6ab13@free-electrons.com> Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 11:20:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 3.16rc3 multiplatform, Armada 370 and IOMMU: unbootable kernel From: Paolo Pisati To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Ezequiel Garcia , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Lunn , Jason Cooper , Joerg Roedel , Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Laurent Pinchart , Gregory CLEMENT , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Florian Vaussard , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Ezequiel Garcia, > > On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 20:37:58 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >> It seems bus_register_notifier() is been called for platform and pci devices >> with the *same* notifier block. Haven't looked close enough, but you mentioned >> that could cause trouble? >> >> This patch fixes the issue here: >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c >> index 477202f..2bdc323 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c >> @@ -292,6 +292,10 @@ static struct notifier_block mvebu_hwcc_nb = { >> .notifier_call = mvebu_hwcc_notifier, >> }; >> >> +static struct notifier_block mvebu_hwcc_pci_nb = { >> + .notifier_call = mvebu_hwcc_notifier, >> +}; >> + >> static void __init armada_370_coherency_init(struct device_node *np) >> { >> struct resource res; >> @@ -427,7 +431,7 @@ static int __init coherency_pci_init(void) >> { >> if (coherency_available()) >> bus_register_notifier(&pci_bus_type, >> - &mvebu_hwcc_nb); >> + &mvebu_hwcc_pci_nb); >> return 0; >> } >> >> Paolo, can you apply it and confirm it fixes the problem? >> >> Greg, can you confirm using the same notifier block pointer >> for two different bus types makes the bus notifier go nuts? > > Looking at how notifier_chain_register() is implemented (which gets > called by bus_register_notifier() -> > blocking_notifier_chain_register()), I indeed don't see how a single > 'struct notifier_block' can be registered on multiple notifier chains, > so I believe your patch is correct. > yes, i confim this patch fixes my issue, thanks! -- bye, p. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/