Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753988AbaGHLIV (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 07:08:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31710 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752753AbaGHLIU (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 07:08:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 13:08:16 +0200 From: Miroslav Lichvar To: John Stultz Cc: LKML , Richard Cochran , Prarit Bhargava Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] timekeeping: Improved NOHZ frequency steering (v2) Message-ID: <20140708110816.GB23173@localhost> References: <1400288204-414-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> <20140519101439.GE4060@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:57:29AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > Another area we have to be careful with is there are still > architectures (powerpc and ia64) which haven't switched from the old > vsyscall rounding logic (CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL_OLD). In these > cases we add up to 1ns of error each tick/update as we round up the > sub-nanoseconds to ensure we don't see inconsistencies. If the > adjustment logic can't handle this, I don't want to regress those > arches. I spent some time trying to figure out a workaround for the nanosecond rounding, but I didn't find anything that wouldn't complicate the mult adjustment logic and bring back the problems which the direct division approach is supposed to solve. It seems it may be a while before the old vsyscalls are fixed. How about including only the first two patches from this set for now? Thanks, -- Miroslav Lichvar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/