Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754888AbaGHNBC (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 09:01:02 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:65519 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754867AbaGHNA7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 09:00:59 -0400 Message-ID: <53BBEB84.50904@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 15:00:52 +0200 From: Sebastian Hesselbarth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , =?UTF-8?B?QW50b2luZSBUw6luYXJ0?= , tj@kernel.org CC: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, zmxu@marvell.com, jszhang@marvell.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/7] phy: add a driver for the Berlin SATA PHY References: <1404728173-20263-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <1404728173-20263-2-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <53BBE419.8080107@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <53BBE419.8080107@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/08/2014 02:29 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > On Monday 07 July 2014 03:46 PM, Antoine Ténart wrote: >> The Berlin SoC has a two SATA ports. Add a PHY driver to handle them. >> >> The mode selection can let us think this PHY can be configured to fit >> other purposes. But there are reasons to think the SATA mode will be >> the only one usable: the PHY registers are only accessible indirectly >> through two registers in the SATA range, the PHY seems to be integrated >> and no information tells us the contrary. For these reasons, make the >> driver a SATA PHY driver. > > Thanks for doing multiple revisions of this. Looks good to be merged for me now. I'd like to see some Acked-by from Tejun on the AHCI patches first, but if he agrees, should I prepare a stable branch for each of us to pull their patches from? AFAIKS, that would be 1+2 for you, 3-5 for Tejun, and the DT crap 6+7 for me. Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/