Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755430AbaGHSGf (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 14:06:35 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0138.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.138]:57571 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755405AbaGHSGc (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 14:06:32 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2194:2199:2393:2553:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3353:3622 X-HE-Tag: form01_727280eb1f556 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3074 Message-ID: <1404842784.932.22.camel@joe-AO725> Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: Add designated reviewers for RCU From: Joe Perches To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, sbw@mit.edu Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 11:06:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20140708080908.GN19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20140707224146.GA9118@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1404772924-9423-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1404772924-9423-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140708080908.GN19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 10:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:42:03PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 1814075c0e74..92f2bf91eec1 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -7405,6 +7405,9 @@ F: kernel/rcu/torture.c > > > > RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK > > M: "Paul E. McKenney" > > +R: Steven Rostedt > > +R: Mathieu Desnoyers > > +R: Lai Jiangshan > > L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > S: Supported > > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git > > OK,.. so if we're going to do this can we talk about the syntax here. > > I would like to also use this for SCHED and PERF, but since both are > rather big I would like to be able to subdivide things. Now I could of > course go create many MAINTAINER sections, but that feels artificial. > > So I would like to be able to write: > > SCHEDULER: > ... > R: Steven Rostedt (kernel/sched/rt.c) > R: Juri Lelli (kernel/sched/deadline.c) > > or something like that. And here I've already done concessions in that > the above is machine readable. Ideally I'd be able to say things like: > 'for sched and numa related things' add 'rik and mel'. > > Hmm, maybe we can look at the patch subject tag like: sched/numa or > sched/rt or sched/deadline etc.. instead of the files touched. I think it's best to use separate sections. The parsing logic in get_maintainers is already ugly enough. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/