Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:04:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:04:44 -0500 Received: from gaea.projecticarus.com ([195.10.228.71]:12962 "EHLO gaea.projecticarus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:04:41 -0500 Message-ID: <3DE3B93F.8090305@walrond.org> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:11:11 +0000 From: Andrew Walrond User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021020 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: trog@wincom.net CC: Rusty Lynch , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: A Kernel Configuration Tale of Woe References: <3de3b72d.10eb.0@wincom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1060 Lines: 30 Contributors could be given a reliability rating (bit like ebay?). Same thing for contributions; users could confirm successful results and boost the rating of the info. Dennis Grant wrote: >>So how would you deal with somebody contributing bogus >>mappings? What if somebody was just wrong, or uploading a >>mapping in error? > > > Well, then the next time somebody queried that mapping and got back the config, > it wouldn't work. And they'd either fix it, or complain to someone who would > fix it. > > So its inherently self-correcting. > > DG > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/