Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756469AbaGIOOG (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2014 10:14:06 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:50747 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756252AbaGIOOE (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2014 10:14:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 10:13:54 -0400 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Andrew Cooper Cc: David Vrabel , konrad@kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/7] xen-pciback: Document the various parameters and attributes in SysFS Message-ID: <20140709141354.GG21837@laptop.dumpdata.com> References: <1404845909-13563-1-git-send-email-konrad@kernel.org> <1404845909-13563-2-git-send-email-konrad@kernel.org> <53BD32C2.6000306@citrix.com> <20140709135922.GD21837@laptop.dumpdata.com> <53BD4C44.30805@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53BD4C44.30805@citrix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:05:56PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 09/07/14 14:59, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > >>> +What: /sys/bus/pci/drivers/pciback/irq_handler_state > >>> +Date: Oct 2011 > >>> +KernelVersion: 3.1 > >>> +Contact: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > >>> +Description: > >>> + An option to toggle Xen PCI back to acknowledge (or stop) > >>> + interrupts for the specific device regardless of whether the > >>> + device is shared, enabled, or on a level interrupt line. > >>> + Writing a string of DDDD:BB:DD.F will toggle the state. > >>> + This is Domain:Bus:Device.Function where domain is optional. > >> I do not understand under what circumstances this should be used in. > > So that dom0 does not disable the IRQ line as it would be getting the IRQs > > for the guest as well (because the IRQ line is level and another guest > > uses an PCI device that is using the same line). > > Why is this relevant? Xen (and Xen alone) actually controls this aspect > of interrupts. Xen manages passing line level interrupts to any domain > which might have a device hanging off a particular line, and has to wait > until all domains have EOI'd the line until it can clear the interrupt > at the IO-APIC. Because Linux will think there is an IRQ storm as the event->IRQ points to the default one. And then it will mask the event, which means dom0 will mask the PIRQ, and Xen will then also mask the IRQ. > > ~Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/