Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756223AbaGITWc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 9 Jul 2014 15:22:32 -0400
Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:60949 "EHLO
	casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755369AbaGITW3 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 9 Jul 2014 15:22:29 -0400
Message-ID: <53BD9670.5030809@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:22:24 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nick Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
CC: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 9
References: <20140709183116.506ad2e4@canb.auug.org.au>	<CAPDOMVjAMHOhuzfcJRL_JQ1jSKOeE7PEhppZJKJKbtR2-ixi-A@mail.gmail.com>	<53BD77CC.9060606@infradead.org>	<20140709184703.GA16363@roeck-us.net>	<53BD8F8E.9030105@infradead.org> <CAPDOMVjBOfLF6CFWYse6-=P4wanvKBE6wmX6by=AhO0vs1jjRw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDOMVjBOfLF6CFWYse6-=P4wanvKBE6wmX6by=AhO0vs1jjRw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 07/09/2014 11:56 AM, Nick Krause wrote:
> Very well then I just wnated  the info for the conversation into my email.
> Seems not a good idea to do on the list. Seems better to do it this way.
> Nick
> 

<see below>

> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>> On 07/09/2014 11:47 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:11:40AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> On 07/09/2014 10:07 AM, Nick Krause wrote:
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Stephen Rothwell wrote on Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:31 AM
>>>>> Subject: linux-next: Tree for Jul 9
>>>>> To: linux-next@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since 20140708:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey Stephen,
>>>>>
>>>>> A lot of your builds that are failing seem to build for me. Please try
>>>>> a compiler toolchain
>>>>> newer then gcc 4.6.3 to see if this is why your builds are failing.
>>>>> Since all the arm builds
>>>>> you have failing build for me.
>>>>> Cheers Nick
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hey Nick,
>>>>
>>>> Does your email client interface have a "Reply All" or "Reply to All" button
>>>> or selection that you can use?  Please use that instead of Forwarding each message.
>>>> That will make it easier to read the email threading.
>>>>
>>> I suspect he may be using an e-mail client from a certain vendor in Redmond, WA.
>>> It appears they have not heard that there is something like '>' to mark original
>>> text in e-mail replies.
>>
>> He used Reply one time and then reverted back to his old ways.
>>
>> Nick, the idea is to use Reply all the time, not just one time.
>> That is, if you want to do things correctly and are not just wasting our time.
>>
>> --
>> ~Randy

The mail thread is all here (just above here), so Reply does keep it,
it's just at the bottom of the email instead of at the top.
That's the way we prefer it, so please don't top-post your replies;
move the text cursor to the bottom of the email and then begin typing.

Thanks.

-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/