Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751507AbaGJHIk (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 03:08:40 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:51655 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750733AbaGJHIj (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 03:08:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 00:07:45 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Sebastien Buisson Cc: Andi Kleen , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow increasing the buffer-head per-CPU LRU size Message-Id: <20140710000745.37be4400.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <53BE37E5.4030407@bull.net> References: <53B667F9.90306@bull.net> <87y4w6sbp7.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <53BA772C.6040506@bull.net> <20140707163003.GA18735@two.firstfloor.org> <20140707152936.a286b0f46ae1b06aa41c1959@linux-foundation.org> <20140707224634.GE18735@two.firstfloor.org> <53BB8F7C.1060505@bull.net> <53BE37E5.4030407@bull.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:51:17 +0200 Sebastien Buisson wrote: > Allow increasing the buffer-head per-CPU LRU size to allow efficient > filesystem operations that access many blocks for each transaction. > For example, creating a file in a large ext4 directory with quota > enabled will accesses multiple buffer heads and will overflow the LRU > at the default 8-block LRU size: > > * parent directory inode table block (ctime, nlinks for subdirs) > * new inode bitmap > * inode table block > * 2 quota blocks > * directory leaf block (not reused, but pollutes one cache entry) > * 2 levels htree blocks (only one is reused, other pollutes cache) > * 2 levels indirect/index blocks (only one is reused) > > The buffer-head per-CPU LRU size can be changed at config time, and its > default value is raised to 16. The patch is a performance optimisation but the changelog omits all mention of the most important part: the magnitude of the performance improvement. > --- a/fs/Kconfig > +++ b/fs/Kconfig > @@ -268,4 +268,18 @@ endif # NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS > source "fs/nls/Kconfig" > source "fs/dlm/Kconfig" > > +config BH_LARGE_LRU > + def_bool y > + depends on (EXT4_FS && QUOTA) > + > +config BH_LRU_SIZE > + int > + range 8 64 > + default "16" if BH_LARGE_LRU > + default "8" if !BH_LARGE_LRU > + help > + This sets the per-CPU LRU size for buffer heads in memory. > + More complex filesystems may be modifying multiple blocks > + within a single transaction, so keeping the buffer heads in > + CPU-local cache speeds up modifications significantly. This hardwires 16 if ext4"a and 8 otherwise. There's no way for anyone to alter this decision if they think it will be helpful (or harmful) in their setup. > endmenu > diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c > index 6024877..b83fa63 100644 > --- a/fs/buffer.c > +++ b/fs/buffer.c > @@ -1255,8 +1255,7 @@ static struct buffer_head *__bread_slow(struct > buffer_head *bh) Your email client is wordwrapping the patches btw. And it replaces tabs with spaces. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/