Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752160AbaGJLBf (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 07:01:35 -0400 Received: from ducie-dc1.codethink.co.uk ([185.25.241.215]:43685 "EHLO ducie-dc1.codethink.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751114AbaGJLBe (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 07:01:34 -0400 Message-ID: <53BE7288.6060503@codethink.co.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 12:01:28 +0100 From: Rob Jones User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Walleij CC: Himangi Saraogi , Alexandre Courbot , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Randy Dunlap , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , Eric Miao , Russell King , Haojian Zhuang , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Philipp Zabel , Paul Parsons , Julia Lawall Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] gpiolib: devres: Introduce the function devm_request_gpio_array References: <1a1752ce7455bac8f2505a9790da891a830699f5.1404665589.git.himangi774@gmail.com> <53BD2509.6070803@codethink.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/07/14 10:21, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Rob Jones wrote: > >> Please note that I submitted a patch on 02/07/14 to create this >> function which was acked by Linus Walleij on 05/07/14. >> >> Great minds think alike, and all that. > > My mind certainly isn't any great :-( > I doubt that :-) > My left hand seems to be unaware of what the right hand is doing. > > Did I ACK that for merging through some other tree then? > You did: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/4/715 > And I guess if Himangi want to submit these ASoC patches, they > will have to go through the same tree as those patches in that case? > I don't know enough to comment. > And would you consider implementing a gpiod version...? > I will certainly consider it. I'm in the middle of something else right now but I should be available in a day or two and I'll have a look. >> However, I think that the version I submitted better replicates the >> original (non devm) functionality, see below. >> >> I didn't, however, add it to the documentation. +1 on that. > > Can you include that oneliner in your patch then to reduce > problems? > Certainly, with acknowledgement to Himangi Saraogi. Should I resubmit the patch series with amendment or should I put it in as a separate patch? Sorry for the noobie question but I *am* new to the kernel lists. > Yours, > Linus Walleij > > -- Rob Jones Codethink Ltd mailto:rob.jones@codethink.co.uk tel:+44 161 236 5575 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/