Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753671AbaGJOEN (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:04:13 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.219.46]:42477 "EHLO mail-oa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752020AbaGJOEM (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:04:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140710111833.GY3935@laptop> References: <1404144343-18720-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1404144343-18720-9-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20140710111833.GY3935@laptop> From: Vincent Guittot Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:03:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/12] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel , Russell King - ARM Linux , LAK , Preeti U Murthy , Morten Rasmussen , Mike Galbraith , Nicolas Pitre , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , Daniel Lezcano , Dietmar Eggemann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10 July 2014 13:18, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 06:05:39PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> + /* >> + * If the CPUs share their cache and the src_cpu's capacity is >> + * reduced because of other sched_class or IRQs, we trig an >> + * active balance to move the task >> + */ >> + if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES) >> + && ((capacity_orig_of(src_cpu) * 100) > (capacity_of(src_cpu) * >> + sd->imbalance_pct))) >> return 1; > > Why is this tied to shared caches? It's just to limit the change of the policy to a level that can have benefit without performance regression. I'm not sure that we can do that at any level without risk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/