Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:23:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:23:37 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:3850 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:23:37 -0500 Message-ID: <3DE44A78.9070602@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 20:30:48 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020827 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Dike CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: uml-patch-2.5.49-1 References: <200211270406.XAA04379@ccure.karaya.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 770 Lines: 29 Jeff Dike wrote: > hpa@zytor.com said: > >>Access control, ability to work in a chroot, ... > > > Point. > > >>For major/minor, this is presumably a misc device (major 10) or, if >>you don't need module support, a kernel core device (major 1), and >>write to device@lanana.org to have a minor number assigned. > > > If you think that this would be better as a misc device than a proc entry, > then I can certainly go along with that. > Absolutely. I think /proc is heavily overused as a really bad devfs. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/